Although if she had made, like, any attempt at all to talk instead of immediately attacking him that might have been more effective.
Brelvis is unique, so there isn’t that much to be gained from studying him. But she doesn’t seem to be able to stick to making that argument instead of verbally attacking, physically attacking, or lying. She really should be more rational!
Both sides have a point.
No they don’t. He *was* attacked; he wasn’t the attacker.
If she thought she had a point, she wouldn’t have lied.
Although if she had made, like, any attempt at all to talk instead of immediately attacking him that might have been more effective.
Brelvis is unique, so there isn’t that much to be gained from studying him. But she doesn’t seem to be able to stick to making that argument instead of verbally attacking, physically attacking, or lying. She really should be more rational!